Local Farmers Sowing Seeds of Carbon Farming

Author: Stephanie Hiller | Published: April 5, 2017 

This year, the third warmest in recorded history, spring has come a month early, with regions all across the United States experiencing May temperatures in March. While warmer temperatures are welcome after a cold, wet winter, the cause is not.

Oceans are warming and rising, and last year was the fourth consecutive year of mass seal pup strandings along local beaches due to reduced populations of anchovies and sardines. Glaciers are melting and collapsing at record rates. Heat waves and fires are likely to threaten our placid summers. Worse disasters loom in our children’s future.

Despite what the Trump administration says, climate change is here. As Naomi Klein pointed out in a 2011 article in The Nation, climate deniers know its consequences full-well: Addressing climate change means not only ending the flow of their black gold—it’s the end of their entire way of life.

“To lower global emissions,” she writes, “can only be done by radically reordering our economic and political systems in many ways antithetical to their ‘free market belief system.’” Hence, oil companies have invested billions to convince much of the voting public that climate change is a hoax and accomplished the ultimate coup d’état with the installation of a like-minded government that will raise the temperature, and the consequences, even more.

But we still have a chance to pull back from our race to the edge. There is a climate-change solution that can take root at the local level which can actually reverse climate change by at least 40 percent. By changing the way we grow food, we can actually draw down carbon from the atmosphere and put it to good use where it belongs: In the soil. Call it carbon farming.

Healthy Soils

North Bay farmers have led the way with these techniques, and with the help of climate-advocacy groups, they won state support to promote a program that just might save the world.

The California Healthy Soils Initiative (CHSI), launched on January 11 in Sacramento by the National Resource Conservation Service and the California Department of Food and Agriculture, encourages farmers to adopt carbon-friendly farming methods by offering grants and training assistance. Grant applications will be accepted later this spring.

Judging from the number of people who turned out for the September “Building Partnerships on Healthy Soil” summit—more than 200 for the conference itself and many more via webcast—interest in this carbon-friendly “regenerative” soil-management program is growing. It can’t come too soon: The very existence of topsoil is at risk.

The World Wildlife Fund reports that more than half of the topsoil worldwide has been lost over the past 150 years, mostly due to industrial agriculture. Some sources say that the loss is more like 70 percent. It’s possible that in 60 years, the topsoil on heavily grazed and monocropped farmlands will be gone, leaving nothing but an impervious layer of hardpan in its place, conditions that led to the Dust Bowl phenomenon in parts of the United States and Canada in the 1930s. Without its thin skin of topsoil, fertile land turns to desert, a process that has been accelerating all over the world in large part because of intensive industrial agriculture.

But David Runsten, policy director of the Community Alliance with Family Farmers (CAFF), says that agriculture can be part of the solution. He began working with the California Climate and Agriculture Network (CalCAN), a nonprofit that advocates for climate-friendly agricultural policy, in 2009 to get state officials to embrace carbon farming.

“Finally, the governor said he would support Healthy Soils,” Runsten says.

The legislation passed last summer and allocates $7.5 million for the program, $3 million for demonstration projects and up to $4 million in grants of up to $25,000. Governor Brown is sold on the program. He originally asked for $20 million once he embraced the idea.

Funding for the program comes from the California Air Resources Board’s Cap-and-Trade Program.

California’s Cap-and-Trade Program generates money from big emitters who are required to buy permits to emit greenhouse gases, says Renata Brillinger, executive director of CalCAN.

“The Legislature and the governor decide how much [of that] money to spend and on what,” Brillinger says. “It’s billions of dollars that we can influence through a democratic process.”

Healthy Soils projects must be directly linked to climate change, she says. “Farmers are getting money to do things on their farm that draws down carbon or reduces emissions. It is the only source of funding in the United States that will pay farmers to do that.”

One of the pioneers of carbon farming is the Marin Carbon Project (MCP). The nonprofit took it upon itself to provide scientific evidence to substantiate the benefits of carbon farming. Working in concert with Whendee Silver, professor of environmental science, policy, and management at U.C. Berkeley, the MCP found that adding a half-inch of compost to the soil increased soil carbon by one ton, or 40 percent, per hectare.

Most dazzling was the discovery that the amount continued to increase by the same rate year after year without adding more compost. This research demonstrated that carbon farming “can improve on-farm productivity and viability, enhance ecosystem functions and stop and reverse climate change,” explains Torri Estrada, executive director of the Carbon Cycle Institute, a Petaluma-based organization partnered with the MCP.

The Carbon Cycle

Plants sequester carbon from atmospheric CO2 by photosynthesis, using the airborne carbon to create carbohydrates and relaying the excess sugars to microbes in the soil. In turn, microbes return carbon to the soil. The more microbes, the more carbon is taken up, the stronger the roots and the more productive and resilient the plant. Adding organic matter to the soil feeds the fungi and bacteria, and enhances the effect.

KEEP READING ON PACIFIC SUN 

Putting A Dollar Value On Ecosystems

Author: Mark Brodie | Published: April 15, 2017 

How do you put a dollar value on something that in some ways is priceless? Like the Mona Lisa? Or biodiversity?

Researchers in a new paper try to do just that — with one specific ecosystem service, provided by grasslands: soil carbon storage.

Bruce Hungate is the director of the Center for Ecosystem Science and Society at Northern Arizona University and lead author of a paper on the economic value of soil carbon storage. The paper was published in “Science Advances.” Mark Brodie from KJZZ interviewed researcher Bruce Hungate to learn more about how the study put a dollar value on soil carbon storage.

LISTEN TO THE INTERVIEW ON KJZZ 

El Día Mundial del Agua, Una Llamada a la Agricultura Sostenible

Autor: EFEAGRO Madrid | Publicado: 22 marzo 2017

La solución para acabar con el hambre del mundo pasa por la utilización del regadío en la agricultura y la biotecnología aplicada a los cultivos, según el presidente de la Federación Nacional de Comunidades de Regantes (Fenacore), Andrés del Campo.

Así lo ha asegurado en declaraciones a Efeagro con motivo de la celebración hoy del Día Mundial del Agua con el que Naciones Unidas quiere sensibilizar y concienciar de este recurso, que no llega a las casas de 663 millones de personas y que, según recuerda este organismo, es esencial para el desarrollo sostenible. Del Campo está convencido de que el futuro del regadío está ligado al aumento de la población. “En 2050, el planeta contará con 9.500 millones de habitantes y hay que pensar en cómo producir más en la misma tierra“, ha recordado.

Modernización de regadíos

A su juicio, la alimentación de una población creciente sólo es posible si se incrementa la productividad agrícola, y ésta sólo se consigue con una mayor eficiencia en el uso del riego y con el desarrollo de la genética en cultivos para obtener plantas con menos necesidad de agua y fitosanitarios.

LEER MÁS AQUÍ
LEER MÁS ARTÍCULOS EN ESPAÑOL AQUÍ

How Soil Microbes and Intercellular Communication Affect Human Health

Author: Dr. Joseph Mercola | Published on: April 9, 2017

Your health is in large part determined by the health of the soil in which your food is grown. In this interview, Dr. Zach Bush delves into the many reasons why this is so.

Bush, who is triple board-certified in internal medicine, endocrinology and metabolism, and hospice and palliative care has done some fascinating and innovative research in this area and is one of the brightest physicians I have ever met.

He began his career as a conventional cancer researcher funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

When his funding dried up following the 2008-2010 recession, Bush transitioned into nutrition, eventually coming to understand how chronic inflammation and loss of intercellular communication is at the core of all disease, and why so many of our foods have lost their medicinal value.

KEEP READING ON MERCOLA.COM

La Agroecología Está Creciendo

Autor: Walter Pengue | Publicado: 20 marzo 2017

Ante los preocupantes impactos de la agricultura industrial, el investigador docente del Área de Ecología del Instituto del Conurbano de la UNGS, Walter Pengue, considera viable implementar hoy un modelo productivo agroecológico en beneficio de la población, los productores y el ambiente.

Entrevista a Walter Pengue || Con un largo y reconocido camino transitado en la temática, Pengue, recientemente designado miembro de número de la Academia Argentina de Ciencias del Ambiente, conversó con Noticias UNGS sobre las políticas públicas en la materia, el problema de la tierra y la necesidad de un reordenamiento territorial participativo del país.

Distintas ciudades del mundo y muchos pueblos y ciudades de la Argentina, enfrentan hoy el problema de los altos niveles de contaminación vinculados a la expansión de la agricultura industrial y el uso de agroquímicos, que afectan el ambiente y la salud de las personas. Hasta el momento, las respuestas en Argentina vinieron por el lado de la prohibición de fumigar a cierta distancia de las viviendas. Pengue propone desde hace décadas la producción agroecológica como modelo alternativo.

LEER MÁS AQUÍ
LEER MÁS ARTÍCULOS EN ESPAÑOL AQUÍ

Mapping the Benefits of Farm Biodiversity

Author: Liz Carlisle | Published: April 3, 2017 

Ninety miles south of San Francisco, the farm town of Watsonville looks like it may have been the inspiration for the Beatles hit “Strawberry Fields Forever.” In wintertime, long strips of black plastic cover the earth, as growers fumigate next year’s strawberry beds with compounds like chloropicrin, which has been designated by both the Environmental Protection Agency and the California Department of Pesticide Regulation as an air contaminant.

Because strawberries are so often planted on their own here, year after year, the industry has resorted to these chemicals to control soil-borne fungal diseases like verticilium, which thrive in the company of their strawberry hosts. But organic grower Javier Zamora has a different strategy.

“I make sure before and after strawberries there’s always something different,” said Zamora, whose JSM Organic Farms has expanded from 1.5 acres to over 100 acres in just five years. “I normally plant broccoli right after—no potatoes, no tomatoes, no eggplant in the three years between strawberries. Those things host the same diseases.” Diversifying his crops hasn’t completely eliminated pests, Zamora said, but it’s made them easier to manage so they don’t damage his harvest. It also relieves the pressure of soil-borne diseases.

In addition to carefully planning his crop rotation, Zamora also mixes things up by intercropping—planting marigolds at the end of his strawberry beds and perennial flowers like lavender in between them.

“Every flower will have a benefit of hosting some beneficial insects and it’s also something I can sell at market,” Zamora said. An immigrant from Michoacán, Mexico, Zamora enrolled in community college at age 43 before entering the Agriculture and Land-Based training Association (ALBA) program to pursue organic farming. He attributes his success to his disciplined crop planning and attention to soil health. “When you’re very diversified like I am,” Zamora said, “you have to be on top of your game. I already know where my 2018 strawberries are going to be planted.”

Using ‘Distant Genetic Cousins’ to Improve Farming

While Zamora has been planning out his rotations, a postdoctoral researcher two hours north in Berkeley has been analyzing dozens of studies of farms that grow a diversity of plants and rotate their crops, to try to understand which rotations promote better pest control. David Gonthier, who was recently hired as an Assistant Professor at the University of Kentucky, has no doubt that crop rotation is an effective tool for breaking up pest and disease cycles, as well as improving soil health, managing nutrient balance, and improving water retention—benefits that ecologists have corroborated in recent studies from Iowa to Ontario.

KEEP READING ON CIVIL EATS 

Healthy Soil Is the Real Key to Feeding the World

Author: David R. Montgomery | Published: April 3, 2017 

One of the biggest modern myths about agriculture is that organic farming is inherently sustainable. It can be, but it isn’t necessarily. After all, soil erosion from chemical-free tilled fields undermined the Roman Empire and other ancient societies around the world. Other agricultural myths hinder recognizing the potential to restore degraded soils to feed the world using fewer agrochemicals.

When I embarked on a six-month trip to visit farms around the world to research my forthcoming book, “Growing a Revolution: Bringing Our Soil Back to Life,” the innovative farmers I met showed me that regenerative farming practices can restore the world’s agricultural soils. In both the developed and developing worlds, these farmers rapidly rebuilt the fertility of their degraded soil, which then allowed them to maintain high yields using far less fertilizer and fewer pesticides.

Their experiences, and the results that I saw on their farms in North and South Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Ghana and Costa Rica, offer compelling evidence that the key to sustaining highly productive agriculture lies in rebuilding healthy, fertile soil. This journey also led me to question three pillars of conventional wisdom about today’s industrialized agrochemical agriculture: that it feeds the world, is a more efficient way to produce food and will be necessary to feed the future.

Myth 1: Large-scale agriculture feeds the world today

According to a recent U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) report, family farms produce over three-quarters of the world’s food. The FAO also estimates that almost three-quarters of all farms worldwide are smaller than one hectare – about 2.5 acres, or the size of a typical city block.

Of course the world needs commercial agriculture, unless we all want to live on and work our own farms. But are large industrial farms really the best, let alone the only, way forward? This question leads us to a second myth.Only about 1 percent of Americans are farmers today. Yet most of the world’s farmers work the land to feed themselves and their families. So while conventional industrialized agriculture feeds the developed world, most of the world’s farmers work small family farms. A 2016 Environmental Working Group report found that almost 90 percent of U.S. agricultural exports went to developed countries with few hungry people.

KEEP READING ON THE CONVERSATION 

Reconsider the Impact of Trees On Water Cycles and Climate, Scientists Ask

Published: March 20, 2016 

Forests and trees play a major role on water cycles and cooler temperatures, contributing to food security and climate change adaptation. In recent decades, the climate change discourse has looked at forests and trees mostly as carbon stocks and carbon sinks, but now scientists are calling for more attention on the relation between trees and water in climate change.

Scientists suggest that the global conversation on trees, forests and climate needs to be turned on its head: the direct effects of trees on climate through rainfall and cooling may be more important than their well-studied capacity of storing carbon. A new publication and a symposium try to shed new light on the debate.

The research paper Trees, forests and water: Cool insights for a hot world compiles older knowledge and new research findings pointing at the important effects of trees on helping to retain water on the ground and to produce cooling moisture, which in turn have a positive impact on food security and climate change adaptation.

Authors are also participating in a two-day virtual symposium hosted by FTA, the CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry. On the occasion of the International Day of Forests (March 21) and World Water Day (March 22), this virtual symposium will serve to discuss the findings of the paper and to new areas of research about the linkages of forests with water and climate.

KEEP READING ON CIFOR

El Suelo Cumple Un Rol Fundamental Ante el Cambio Climático

Autor: Erick Zagal | Publicado: 30 marzo 2017

“Globalmente, los suelos almacenan mucho más de tres veces carbono (C) que lo que encontramos en la vegetación sobre el suelo o la atmósfera. Por ello, son el principal reservorio de materia orgánica en ecosistemas terrestres, y sus propiedades químicas, físicas y biológicas determinan lo vulnerable que es este carbono de ser transformado por procesos de descomposición microbianos, a CO2 y metano (CH4), escapando a la atmósfera como gases de efecto invernadero, y así contribuir al calentamiento global”, señala el Dr. Erick Zagal, del Departamento de Suelos y Recursos Naturales de la Facultad de Agronomía de la Universidad de Concepción.

Explica que la materia orgánica en los suelos puede ser también recalcitrante (muy estable), química y físicamente protegida de la descomposición. Sin embargo, así como los suelos pueden ser una fuente de carbono a la atmósfera, estos también pueden constituir un sumidero de este, a través de procesos de captura o ingreso desde la atmósfera al suelo.

Este flujo anual, que significa fijación de CO2 por las plantas (fotosíntesis) y su entrada al suelo vía raíces o material vegetal que cae a la superficie, además de la acción de descomposición microbiana, por sí solo excede en seis o más veces a las emisiones de CO2 a la atmósfera producto de las actividades realizadas por el ser humano.

“Aunque no necesariamente todo este flujo de carbono al suelo permanezca en el tiempo allí sin volver a la atmósfera, sí revela la importancia que este tiene y el rol que puede jugar en un clima que está cambiando. Revela también la necesidad de mejorar nuestro conocimiento acerca de los mecanismos que estabilizan el carbono del suelo de manera de entender que efectivamente este constituya un sumidero y no una fuente de CO2 al ambiente”.

LEER MÁS AQUÍ
LEER MÁS ARTÍCULOS EN ESPAÑOL AQUÍ

Si Se Trata de Salvar al Planeta, Las Lombrices Son Más Importantes Que Otras Especies Más Llamativa

Autor: El Ciudadano | Publicado: 30 marzo 2017

No todas las especies salvajes son iguales a los ojos humanos. Por ejemplo, las lombrices no tienen ese encanto tierno que nos atrae de mamíferos como los panda o la simpatía que nos identifica con los chimpancés. Las lombrices y gusanos nunca serán tildados de lindos, por eso es que jamás son “rostro” de campañas medioambientales.

Pero Darwin reconoció, y con razón, que la conservación de los gusanos es mucho más importante si se considera su aporte a lo que llamamos servicios ecosistémicos, que son cruciales para la supervivencia humana.

Darwin pasó 39 años estudiando a estos animales por una buena razón. De hecho, a las lombrices de tierra se les ha dado el primer lugar entre las especies más influyentes en la historia del planeta; por sobre dinosaurios y humanos.

LEER MÁS AQUÍ
LEER MÁS ARTÍCULOS EN ESPAÑOL AQUÍ