Adding Animals Adds Profit, Organic Matter for North Dakota Farm

Author: Laurie Bedord | Date Published: May 31, 2017 

The quality of food Paul Brown raises hinges on the quality of the soil on which it is grown.

“When my parents purchased the farm from my grandfather in 1991, the soil’s organic matter ranged from 1.7% to 1.9%,” he says. “Four years of crop failure and nearly going broke got my dad thinking outside the box. He began growing multispecies crops, expanding crop rotation, and eventually growing cover crops to diversify and build the soil’s resiliency.”

From a very young age, cattle were part of life on the farm for Brown. “We always had about 250 pairs grazing the land, and we marketed directly to consumers,” he says.

It wasn’t until he returned to the farm in 2010, after graduating from North Dakota State University, that the idea for diversifying this part of the business also took shape.

“These soils developed over thousands of years with grazing animals rotating throughout the landscape,” says the 29-year-old. “The longer we can keep land and livestock integrated, the healthier our soils will be. If we can mimic the template nature laid out for us, we will continue to build the resilience back into the ecosystem that was damaged.”

HENS AND MORE

His first year back, Brown invested in 100 laying hens, which follow cattle on pasture. A mobile chicken coop serves as a place for the birds to lay eggs, roost, and take refuge at night.

“I started with hens because they are relatively low cost,” he says. “Since I had never raised hens before, I wouldn’t have gone broke if it was a complete debacle.”

Grazing is supplemented with grain by-products. “We do some grain cleaning and sell cover crop seed. Those screenings are fed to the hens. We are turning a waste product into eggs we can sell. Once you start to build enterprises that are feeding off each other, that is where a lot of profitability comes in,” Brown says.

Looking to find a market for his eggs, he connected with a local CSA (community supported agriculture) group.

“I was exposed to 125 potential customers,” he says. “Most of them ended up buying from me and still do. It was a great product to introduce to customers because they are willing to pay $5 for a dozen eggs.”

Today, his flock has grown to over 1,000 laying hens. Once customers realized how good the eggs were, demand grew for other offerings.

“In 2013, I added hair sheep. I started with 20 ewe lambs and a ram,” he says. “I am up to 150 ewes now. A year later, I added six sows and a boar and have 25 Berkshire and Tamworth sows farrowing out today. Pigs are raised on pasture and fed non-GMO grains grown on the ranch.”

Integrating a variety of animals has flourished into a successful business. It has also paid dividends in bolstering organic matter, which is close to 7% today.

“Knowing what I know now, I think I can reach 12% by the time I retire,” Brown says.

KEEP READING ON SUCCESSFUL FARMING

California Today: To Fight Climate Change, Heal the Ground

Author: Mike McPhate | Published: May 30, 2017 

The climate change fight has focused largely on cutting emissions.

But California is now considering another solution: dirt.

Whereas an overabundance of carbon in the air has been disrupting our climate, plants are hungry for the stuff.

The Central Valley’s farmlands essentially operate as a vast lung, breathing in carbon dioxide through photosynthesis and converting it into plant tissues. That results in less of the heat-trapping gas in the atmosphere.

But the healthier the soil, the more carbon is stored in plants.

Enter California’s Healthy Soils Initiative, a statewide program rolling out this summer that is the first of its kind in the country.

“I think there’s a growing recognition that the soil beneath our feet has huge potential to sequester carbon,” said Karen Ross, secretary of the state’s Department of Food and Agriculture.

More than a quarter of California’s landmass is used for agriculture. Over generations, farming practices like monocropping and tillage have reduced the amount of organic matter in the soil, affecting plant growth. Some of that organic matter, which contains carbon, needs to be put back.

KEEP READING ON THE NEW YORK TIMES 

Your Fleece Jacket Pollutes the Ocean. Here’s the Possible Fix.

Author:  Mary Catherine O’Connor | Published: May 25, 2017 

By now you’ve probably heard the news: your favorite fleece sheds hundreds of thousands of tiny synthetic fibers every time it’s washed. Those fibers often skirt through wastewater treatment plants and make their way into aquatic organisms that eat the floating fibers. That’s bad for the fish, because the fibers are vectors for toxins and can retard their growth, and it could be bad for people who eat the fish.

This shedding puts outdoor manufacturers in a bind: many want to protect the outdoors, but they also want to sell product. Consumers who love their warm fleece are also faced with a dilemma.

Some brands have taken steps to address the threat of microfibers, which are considered a type of microplastic pollution. In 2015, Patagonia asked university researchers to quantify how much fiber its products shed during laundry—the answer was a lot. And the Outdoor Industry Association has convened a working group to start examining microfiber pollution. But here’s the thing: rather than using money to develop a process that prevents the shedding, most brands are still focused on defining their culpability. Because there are other sources of microfiber pollution in the sea, such as fraying fishing ropes, these brands want to be able to know for certain how much they’re contributing before they move further.

That won’t be an easy task, but Mountain Equipment Co-op, an REI-like retailer headquartered in Vancouver, recently gave microplastics researchers at the Vancouver Aquarium a $37,545 grant to help scientists develop a tracking process. The yearlong project will be led by the aquarium’s ocean pollution research program director and senior scientist Peter Ross. The first step is to create a database of fibers from up to 50 different textiles commonly used in MEC’s house-brand apparel.

This won’t be a simple spreadsheet with the names of the polymers, like polyester or nylon. Each piece of outdoor apparel is treated with chemicals like a durable water repellant (DWR). Then there’s the kaleidoscope of colors in each brand’s catalog. Those variants give the fibers a unique profile, sort of like a fingerprint. To capture those fingerprints, Ross and his team will use a machine called a Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometer, which looks at the fibers on a molecular level.

Once that database is created, the researchers will subject the fibers to saltwater, sunlight, wave action, freshwater, and bacteria to mimic the types of weatherization that they would experience in the field. In fact, one set of fibers will be staked out in Vancouver Harbor and another in the Frasier River estuary. A third set, for the sake of experimentation, will be artificially weathered inside the aquarium’s lab. After increments of time—30, 60, 90, and 180 days—the fibers will be reexamined and any changes in those polymer fingerprints will be documented and added to a database. The hope is that sometime in the future, a random synthetic microfiber could be pulled from Vancouver Bay, analyzed, and determined to originate from an MEC jacket.

KEEP READING ON OUTSIDE ONLINE 

Declaración de Regeneración Internacional sobre el Anuncio de Trump de Retirarse del Acuerdo de París


Junio 2, 2017

Contacto: Katherine Paul, 207-653-3090, katherine@regenerationinternational.org, Ercilia Sahores, +52 55 6257 790, ercilia@regenerationinternational.org

MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. – El Comité Ejecutivo de Regeneración Internacional emitió el día de ayer el siguiente comunicado, condenando la decisión del Presidente de los Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, de retirar a ese país del acuerdo de París:

La decisión del Presidente estadounidense Donald Trump es una clara indicación de una sorprendente e imprudente negativa a reconocer la crisis más grande de nuestros tiempos y la manera en que dicha crisis está vinculada con el futuro de la salud del planeta, la soberanía alimentaria, la prosperidad económica y la estabilidad geopolítica.

Afortunadamente, la decisión de Trump no desalentará a los cientos de grupos internacionales y la veintena de naciones que están comprometidas con el impulso de soluciones climáticas que incluyen no solamente la reducción de emisiones de combustibles fósiles, sino también el escalonamiento del uso regenerativo del suelo y la agricultura regenerativa, que tienen la capacidad de capturar miles de millones de toneladas de carbono excedentes de la atmósfera y almacenarlas en suelos sanos.

Regeneración Internacional continuará su trabajo en esta área con sus contrapartes internacionales, incluyendo la Iniciativa Francesa 4 por 1000: Suelos por la Seguridad Alimentaria, que busca ayudar a gobiernos alrededor del mundo para que trabajen en conjunto con agricultores y tomadores de decisiones para que incorporen formalmente a la agricultura regenerativa en sus planes nacionales para enfrentar el cambio climático.

Regeneración Internacional, un proyecto de la Asociación de Consumidores Orgánicos, está desarrollando una red global de campesinos, científicos, empresas, activistas, educadores, periodistas, gobiernos y consumidores que promueven y practican la agricultura regenerativa y prácticas de uso de suelo que: proveen alimentos abundantes y nutritivos; reviven las economías locales, reconstruyen la fertilidad del suelo y la biodiversidad y restituyen la estabilidad climática devolviendo el carbono al suelo, a través de la práctica natural de fotosíntesis.

 

Regeneración International Anuncia los Ganadores de los Cinco Micro-Créditos del Concurso de Proyectos Regenerativos

1 de junio de 2017

Contacto: Alex Groome, alexandra@regenerationinternational.org, +52 1 415 138 4478; Ercilia Sahores, ercilia@regenerationinternational.org   +52 55 6257 7901

MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. – Regeneración Internacional (RI) anunció el día de hoy los ganadores de los cinco microcréditos otorgados a proyectos regenerativos innovadores.

Los proyectos ganadores, escogidos entre un total de 216 proyectos presentados de 60 países son: Acacias para Todos (Túnez), Agua Santa Regeneración (Ecuador), Grow a Farmer (Uganda) SOIL (Haití); y TH Climate Park Myanmar (Myanmar).

Para la competencia, llamada “Cinco Innovaciones para la Regeneración”, el Comité Ejecutivo de RI utilizó el Regeneration Hub (RHub) como herramienta para identificar proyectos de regeneración innovadores, escalables y replicables en todo el mundo. El Comité seleccionó cinco finalistas y destacó 16 proyectos a los cuales se les dieron menciones honoríficas.

El objetivo de RHub es impulsar la adopción y desarrollo de proyectos regenerativos escalables y replicables en el mundo, facilitando la colaboración e inspirando a aquellos a cargo del desarrollo de proyectos, individuos, fondeadoras y comunidades que trabajan en proyectos de agricultura regenerativa y uso de suelo y otros conceptos relacionados que abordan múltiples desafíos globales, incluyendo el cambio climático y la soberanía alimentaria.

Te Presentamos las Cinco Innovaciones para la Regeneración

Acacias for All está poniéndole un alto a la desertificación causada por el cambio climático en Túnez al plantar muros verdes de árboles de acacia en colaboración con comunidades rurales locales. El Proyecto tiene 14 embajadores en 13 regiones de Túnez y hace poco lanzó el desafīo “1 millón de árboles para Túnez”.

Agua Santa Regeneración restaura tierras ancestrales muy degradadas en los altos Andes de Ecuador y apoya las familias de las comunidades circundantes dándoles árboles frutales para sus jardines e impartiendo cursos de agrosilvicultura.

Grow a Farmer combina tecnología de información de la comunicación, permacultura y negocios en un modelo único tridimensional que apoya el desarrrollo de una masa crítica de agricultores de pequeña escala para ayudarlos a regenerar ecosistemas y construir comunidades auto-sustentables. La organización ha trabajado con más de 360 grupos campesinos desde 2008 y su meta es capacitar a más de 150,000 campesinos cada año durante los próximos 4 años.

Proyectos Orgánicos Integrados Sustentables (SOIL, por sus siglas en inglés) es una organización no gubernamental dedicada a la protección de los recursos del suelo,la restauración del medio ambiente, la promoción del crecimiento de las economías locales y el empoderamiento de comunidades a través de la transformación de desperdicios en recursos, por ejemplo a través de la composta en Haití. Ahora brindan a más de 1,000 hogares un sistema sanitario digno y transforman anualmente más de 320 toneladas de desperdicio humano. Un ejemplo poderoso de cuan asequible y efectivo puede ser acceder a servicios sanitarios sustentables en el mundo.

En 2012, el equipo de la Worldview International Foundation (WIF) comenzó un proyecto piloto con dos universidades locales para restaurar 750 hectáreas de manglares. Hasta ahora, el Proyecto ha plantado 2,7 millones de árboles y está siendo replicado en otras partes de Myanmar para contribuir a la restauración de 80,0000 hectáreas de manglares. Una meta constante del Proyecto es beneficiar a las comunidades que se llevan la peor parte de los impactos del cambio climático.

Para saber más, vea este video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyIIDYoA0jo

Súmese a la red: https://www.regenerationhub.co/es/ 

###

Regeneración Internacional, un proyecto de la Asociación de Consumidores Orgánicos,está desarrollando una red global de campesinos, científicos, empresas, activistas, educadores, periodistas,gobiernos y consumidores que promueven y practican la agricultura regenerativa y prácticas de uso de suelo que: proveen alimentos abundantes y nutritivos; reviven las economías locales, reconstruyen la fertilidad del suelo y la biodiversidad y restituyen la estabilidad climática devolviendo el carbono al suelo, a través de la práctica natural de fotosíntesis.

Regeneration International Statement on Trump’s Plan to Withdraw from Paris Climate Deal

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 1, 2017

Contact: Katherine Paul, 207-653-3090, katherine@regenerationinternational.org

Regeneration International Statement on Trump’s Plan to Withdraw from Paris Climate Deal

MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. – The steering committee of Regeneration International today issued the following statement, condemning President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw from the international Paris climate agreement:

President Trump’s decision is indicative of a stunning and reckless refusal to acknowledge the greatest crisis of our time, and how that crisis is intertwined with the future of global health, food sovereignty, economic prosperity and geopolitical stability.

Fortunately, the President’s decision will not deter the hundreds of international groups, and scores of nations, that are committed to advancing climate solutions that include not just the reduction of fossil fuel emissions, but also the scaling up of regenerative agriculture and land-use practices capable of drawing down billions of tons of excess carbon from the atmosphere, and storing it in healthy soils.

Regeneration International will continue its work in this area with our international partners, including France’s 4/1000 Initiative: Soils for Food Security and Climate Initiative which aims to help international governments work with farmers and policymakers to formally incorporate regenerative agriculture into their national plans to address climate change.

Regeneration International is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization building a global network of farmers, scientists, businesses, activists, educators, journalists, governments and consumers who will promote and put into practice regenerative agriculture and land-use practices that: provide abundant, nutritious food; revive local economies; rebuild soil fertility and biodiversity; and restore climate stability by returning carbon to the soil, through the natural process of photosynthesis. .

Saving America’s Broken Prairie

Author:   | Published: April 26, 2017 

Out near wear the continent divides, up on a ridge carved by ice over millennia, among blazing star, blue aster, purple prairie clover, harebell, and smooth brome — grasses all yet untouched by the plow — Neil Shook balls up some purple pasqueflower, shoves it into his nostril, and snorts.

He loves to do this.

“Mash it up really good,” Shook says as he hands me a piece of flower. “Really good.” And I, too, shove pasqueflower up my nose and snort.

“Did you get it?” Shook asks. I do. It’s a burn that is supposed to be just the thing for clearing a stuffy sinus, and while I’m not yet a convert, I get Shook’s larger point, too: This plain land is home to strange and wild life.

Shook is the manager at Chase Lake National Wildlife Refuge, a 4,385-acre expanse of federally protected grasslands and wetlands in east-central North Dakota. Each year, tens of thousands of pelicans, cormorants, gulls, herons, and others come here to nest, and I’ve come to learn more about a place Shook calls “heaven.”

On this stretch of grass, he bounces from plant species to grass species with a boyish exuberance that defies his years of work toward conserving America’s grassy core — a battle that has been, by almost every measure, a losing one.

This is as good an entry point as any into the complex, highly altered and highly threatened ecosystem that stretches some 1.4 million square miles down central Canada and through the U.S. heartland down to Mexico. Shove pasqueflower up your nose. Touch the grass as it waves in the wind. Hear the insects’ blanket drone. There is no etymological connection between “prairie” and “prayer,” but at times it seems there ought to be.

“Every plant out here has a purpose, and every animal or insect that’s found here has purpose,” Shook says. “There’s a relationship between those plants and animals, and we don’t understand what that relationship is — or we may not understand the importance of it — but it’s there for a reason. And when it’s gone, who knows what we lost?”

I went to North Dakota to see what I thought was the region’s defining story: The shale oil boom and bust that has reshaped the heartland’s economy and upended energy geopolitics just about everywhere. But it turns out that oil is just one part of a great transformation now underway in North America’s Great Plains and Central Lowlands, the likes of which has not been seen since the Dust Bowl. A biome that can be, in some spots, every bit as diverse and complex as a rainforest sits in the country’s backyard, and it’s coming undone.

This is flyover country. It’s easy to view North Dakota’s unending flatness as boring, empty, untamed. There’s a long tradition of seeing the prairie — this vast stretch of fertile, grass-dominated land — as negative space with no purpose other than to be transformed into something with purpose.

The famed naturalist Aldo Leopold saw it differently. “Prairie was, in fact, a community of wild animals and plants so organized,” he wrote, “as to build, through the centuries, the rich soil which now feeds us.”

In other words, all that pasqueflower, ragwort, indigo, and milkweed — all those bison, prairie dogs, pronghorns, daphnia, water boatmen, and eared grebes — have lived and died across the millennia, cycling nutrients from sun to leaves to soil to flesh and back into soil again. The soil that remains is packed with deep energy we turn into food for ourselves and the animals that feed us. Increasingly, this old, flat land provides fossil fuels, wind, and corn that we turn into modern energy and use in our homes and cars.

The prairie’s commodification has served as a tremendous boon to civilization, but not without costs. The grasslands of central North America have declined by approximately 79 percent in area since Europeans began arriving in large numbers in the early 1800s, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. In some places — particularly in the wetter, and more fertile, eastern tallgrass prairies — grassland cover has declined 99.9 percent since 1830.

It turns out that oil is just one part of a great transformation now underway in North America’s Great Plains and Central Lowlands.

“Every plant out here has a purpose, and every animal or insect that’s found here has purpose,” Shook says.

New pressures threaten to wipe out what’s left. Budgets for federal conservation programs are being cut. President Trump’s budget proposal would reduce Interior Department spending by 12 percent. Biofuel mandates, farm subsidies, and crop insurance give farmers incentive to put more land into production. Genetically modified seeds give them the technology to grow crops where they previously could not. An emergent middle class in China and across the developing world increases demand for the kinds of row crops that can feed nations. Oil production has creeped in from the west, spurred on by the fracking revolution, though low oil prices have tempered its advance. Wind power takes up space, too.

Throw climate change into the mix and it’s no wonder scientists call the American prairie one of the most threatened ecosystems on the planet.

“I’m always amazed that I can get on an airplane, pick up the [in-flight] magazine and have someone tell me about the crisis in the rainforest,” says John Devney, vice president for U.S. policy at Delta Waterfowl, a habitat conservation group focused on hunting. “Nobody tells this story,” he adds, gesturing to the grasslands behind him at a ranch outside Wing, North Dakota. “This is way more proximate to a hell of a lot of more people in the United States of America. What happens here in land use has implications — not just if you’re a duck hunter and you want to shoot a gadwall in Louisiana that’s produced in Sheridan County, North Dakota. It has implications [for] what’s happening in the Gulf of Mexico. It has consequences [for] what’s happening in Sioux Falls — with water quality, carbon sequestration values, [and] incredible biodiversity richness.”

The tension here is between maintaining the capacity to feed billions of people and maintaining the land that makes it possible. Soil is considered a finite resource, and can be revived only if given the time and space. Conservation science and holistic land management practices can help, but they compete with economics and policies that encourage liberal use of the plow.

When Neil Shook arrived at Chase Lake in 2010, he started seeing plumes of smoke on the horizon. Commodity prices were rising rapidly, and landowners rushed to convert as many acres as possible into agriculturally productive land. First they burned the grass, then they plowed the land and planted it with corn, soybean, or other crops. By 2013, it looked like “the apocalypse,” he recalls. “It was just like somebody dropped a nuke,” Shook says. “Just ‘boom.’”

It’s called “breaking” prairie when farmers turn grassland into cropland. And once broken, the prairie is hard to fix.

KEEP READING ON UNDARK

“Carbon Farming” Offers New Chance for Cattle Ranch

Author: Deborah Sullivan Brennan | Published: May 12, 2017 

he cattle herds at Santa Ysabel Ranch have provided meat and milk for centuries, and now they’re on the cutting edge of a new kind of agriculture: carbon farming.

By bunching cattle together and grazing them intensively for short periods, ranchers hope to restore grasslands and soil, and capture carbon from the atmosphere. In the ideal scenario, the operation could sequester more carbon than it produces, offsetting greenhouse gas emissions from cars or electric power.

If it sounds counterintuitive that grass-munching cows could beef up vegetation, or that cattle ranching — often criticized for its deep carbon footprint — could be a climate solution, Kevin Muno and his partner Jarod Cauzza aim to prove otherwise.

Through their company, Land of Milk and Honey, they’re conducting an experiment on the back country ranch in what they call regenerative agriculture, a process that aims to improve the area’s ecology. And they’re betting they can turn a profit doing it.

“We want to build soil, have more wildlife, have more cattle and more money for the families” working the land, Muno said.

They plan to sell grass-fed beef online, and eventually add other livestock to the operation. For now, they’re developing the system, which they hope will be a template for other ranches in the county.

The Resource Conservation District of Greater San Diego County received a $10,000 grant to develop a carbon farming plan with the ranchers that could guide similar efforts throughout the county, said executive director Sheryl Landrum. With more than 5,000 small farms and 208,564 acres of range land, San Diego could employ carbon farming to help meet its climate goals.

“We’re hoping that through this plan we might have something tangible for other agencies and other interested parties,” Landrum said.

KEEP READING ON THE SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE